Adam P. Karp Animal Attorney ~ Expose Blog Michael Allmain Case

How an Animal Rights Attorney, I Allege, Aided and Abetted the Theft of a VALUABLE Emotional Support Animal of a Homeless Man and Deliberately, Knowingly Caused him Mental Anguish, with alleged Co-Conspirators, set this man up, with intent, for a crime he did not commit and used Abuse of Process and Fraud on the Courts to do so. This Blog Is My Gathering Evidence for a Future 3rd Party Criminal Complaint. Written Upon the Knowledge and Belief of Reverend Crystal Cox of Universal Church of Light

Wednesday, October 6, 2021

Jefferson County Prosecutor put in the Court Record that Michael Allmain is Indigent. Yet Michael Allmain was found GUILTY and can never Own a Dog Again nor Ever get his dog back, Court Said there was not a Record of Michael being Indigent.

An indigent person is defined as extremely poor, lacking the basic resources of a normal life by definition.

In a Court Hearing on 3-26-2021 Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Puts on the Court Record that Michael Allmain is indigent.

An indigent person is defined as extremely poor, lacking the basic resources. ONE Clear Sign in COURT that a person is INDIGENT as a Matter of Record, in a Criminal Case, is they Have Public Attorney.

If Michael Allmain was NOT Indigent he would not have had Nat Jacobs as his Public Attorney, and perhaps never ever met him Right? So, the VERY FACT that Michael Allmain has a PUBLIC ATTORNEY puts it on the Court Record that Michael Was Indigent.

This Post is part of a series of Videos, Port Townsend Leader Articles and other Evidence that proves there was a Clear and Proven record in the court as a matter of law, that Micheal Allmain was Indigent.

You may wonder why this is important?

Well Michael Allmain can never own a dog again as of Oct 2021. He owes CVAR $28,000. CVAR I allege, through their attorney Adam Karp STOLE Michael's Dog, his Best of Everything, His Peace of Mind, His PROPERTY, Moses through what I allege as Fraud on the Courts, with a premeditated lien on Michael's personal property, with this lien they sued Michael for vet bills they forced, and planned to place, proven over 2 years with CVAR's Facebook Threads. They executed on this alleged crime on October 1st 2021 through Judge Keith Harpers Court in Port Townsend Washington through a Declaratory Judgment in Civil Court of which Michael had no idea how to defend himself on and Adam Karp did not care about this Pro Se litigants confusion and in fact preyed on him. (those nasty emails coming soon)

You see after the City of Port Townsend Took Michael Allmain's dog for being "at large" then they drummed up Neglect and Abuse charges for an admitted skin condition and ear infection. They gave CVAR this man's best friend and private property, and put his life at risk for a skin condition and an ear infection? NOPE for a VENDETTA by a Rabid Vigilante Mob led by CVAR, a Local Animal Rescue Non-Profit.

A Criminal Case ensued over nearly a year, a Civil Case followed. Like a ONE Two Punch, GUILTY than Ruled Against. WHAM !!

Michael Allmain was RULED GUILTY of Neglect and Abuse by Judge Mindy Walker, the reason apparently, was Michael is Guilty because he did not prove as a matter of record he was indigent

The Question immediately begs to be asked,
How did this Guy get an Attorney FOR FREE, Right?

The mere FACT that Attorney Nat Jacobs, as Michael's Court Appointed Attorney was in that court with Michael, PROVES Michael Allmain Indigent as a Matter of Law, in my Opinion.

Later when we look more at the Michael Allmain Criminal Case Docket, we will see more filings, I Believe as to when the Court Appointed Michael Allmain an Attorney and for What Legal Reason?

My guess is this same court appointed Nat Jacobs as Michael Allmain's Public attorney because he was "poor" "indigent" as a matter of record. Let's Continue..

How did Michael Allmain Prove he was too poor to pay an attorney?

Is that on the record? (Better Be Right?)

Seems to me the court would have a record that Michael Allmain was Poor before they wasted precious Tax Payer Dollars to pay for him to have a FREE attorney. Yet then this same court renders a Guilty plea because Michael Allmain or his attorney Nat Jacobs did not prove he was indigent? What? Wouldn't that have had to be done to be appointed a costly public defender in the first place?

If you were to apply for a Public Defender in Port Townsend What would you need to do? Read Below to Understand that.

https://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/DocumentCenter/View/10204/Public-Defender-Application-with-Instructions

So I have not got this from the Docket Yet, but for now, I am Going to Go ahead and Assume that Michael Allmain Applied for a Public Attorney, and that to Get this Valuable Asset given to him for FREE, he had to apply and be approved, and then, as a matter of court record Michael Allmain would have to have a court DETERMINATION OF INDIGENCY, on the Docket right? And then have an attorney appointed to him, but only when he had a Judicial Ruling that he QUALIFIED for a Court Appointed Attorney BECAUSE he was Indigent. Right? You following all this?

So If this Same Court RULED that Michael Allmain Was Indigent and therefore Qualified for a Public Attorney, as a Matter of Law, on the Court Record, then HOW in the WORLD can this Same Court around 8 months later deem Michael Allmain GUILTY because he did not Prove he was Indigent? Smells Fishy to Me and I Trust the the GUILTY will be held Accountable, the Evidence of What they did to this man is Clear to Me.

What was Worth this Beautiful Family?

Seems to me like somebody is in Trouble Here Right? But Who?

Well they have a well oiled Monsters Among Us Machine, and YES I will file complaints with all agencies against all parties. However for now I want the Public of Port Townsend to understand what happened here, as YOU could be their Next Target.

To me there is Fraud on the Courts and Abuse of Process in the least, Either Way. If Michael Allmain had no Affidavit of Indigence on the Docket than he should not have legally been allowed an attorney, so if that's the case, WOW Right, who is on the hook for those attorney fees? And if Michael Allmain had an Affidavit of Indigence, that qualified him for a Court Appointed Attorney, then how in the WORLD was he found GUILTY because he had not proven as a matter of court record that he was Indigent?

Sounds a Little Like a ... Kangaroo Court to Me

Kind of Makes Your Head Spin Don't It?

OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE, RIGHT?

Was There a Court Ruling That was a Determination of Indigency in this Case or Not?

Let’s Take a Look at Washington Law Regarding

Determination of indigency

RCW 10.101.020: Determination of indigency—Provisional ...https://apps.leg.wa.gov › rcw

(1) A determination of indigency shall be made for all persons wishing the appointment of counsel in criminal, juvenile, involuntary commitment, ...

RCW 10.101.020

Determination of indigency

Research Link for Ya’LL

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=10.101.020

RCW 10.101.020

Determination of indigency. Provisional appointment. Promissory note.

(1) A determination of indigency shall be made for all persons wishing the appointment of counsel in criminal, juvenile, involuntary commitment, and dependency cases, and any other case where the right to counsel attaches. The court or its designee shall determine whether the person is indigent pursuant to the standards set forth in this chapter.

(2) In making the determination of indigency, the court shall also consider the anticipated length and complexity of the proceedings and the usual and customary charges of an attorney in the community for rendering services, and any other circumstances presented to the court which are relevant to the issue of indigency. The appointment of counsel shall not be denied to the person because the person's friends or relatives, other than a spouse who was not the victim of any offense or offenses allegedly committed by the person, have resources adequate to retain counsel, or because the person has posted or is capable of posting bond.

(3) The determination of indigency shall be made upon the defendant's initial contact with the court or at the earliest time circumstances permit. The court or its designee shall keep a written record of the determination of indigency. Any information given by the accused under this section or sections shall be confidential and shall not be available for use by the prosecution in the pending case.

(4) If a determination of eligibility cannot be made before the time when the first services are to be rendered, the court shall appoint an attorney on a provisional basis. If the court subsequently determines that the person receiving the services is ineligible, the court shall notify the person of the termination of services, subject to court-ordered reinstatement.

(5) All persons determined to be indigent and able to contribute, shall be required to execute a promissory note at the time counsel is appointed. The person shall be informed whether payment shall be made in the form of a lump sum payment or periodic payments. The payment and payment schedule must be set forth in writing. The person receiving the appointment of counsel shall also sign an affidavit swearing under penalty of perjury that all income and assets reported are complete and accurate. In addition, the person must swear in the affidavit to immediately report any change in financial status to the court.

(6) The office or individual charged by the court to make the determination of indigency shall provide a written report and opinion as to indigency on a form prescribed by the office of public defense, based on information obtained from the defendant and subject to verification. The form shall include information necessary to provide a basis for making a determination with respect to indigency as provided by this chapter. "

[ 1997 c 41 § 5; 1989 c 409 § 3.]

Seems to me Either Way the Court Messed this up, AS A MATTER OF RECORD,
As a Matter of Law.

So who is accountable for this man’s life, his suffering, his mental anguish, his life endangerment? His loss of his best friend FOREVER and Insult to Massive Injury, ALONG with that, clear to me, Lawless Verdict, Michael Allmain can NEVER own a DOG Again EVER.

What a Bunch of Monsters eH?

All whipped up into a LIFE THREATENING, Torturing Lynch Mob Frenzy by a Local Non-Profit. Lessons to Be Learned here Jefferson County Washington.

Surely No Matter which way you look at the information on this post, the Judge, in my Opinion Dunn "Screwed the Pooch" as they say.

In case my Reader is unfamiliar with the term "Screwed the Pooch" it means: "to commit an egregious blunder".

Who is Liable for this Malicious Chaos?

Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Julie St. Marie SEEMS Maliciously Confused, IS MOSES EVIDENCE OR NOT? As a Matter of LAW?

Jefferson County Washington Prosecuting Attorney Julian Elizabeth St. Marie. Moses is Evidence. Weeks Later Moses is NOT Evidence and Has No Evidentiary Value

This Video is Part of a Video and Article Series Asking the Question, and gathering Evidence for Future Citizen, 3rd Party Complaints, Was Michael Allmain's Dog Moses Evidence? If so when did Moses become Evidence. Was the Rules of Evidence Followed per Jefferson County Criminal Law / Code Procedure?

Why on March 12, 2021 did Melissa Pleimann, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney states on the record that Moses is Not Evidence and Judge Mindy Walker Replied, as per my own witness, video transcript on that coming soon, SAID YES Moses is Evidence.

Then on 3-26-2021 Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Julie St. Marie, Says Moses Ruled as Evidence, then when Attorney Nat Jacobs is trying to save a man's life and do the right thing asks for the return of Moses, and to send a Vet to Moses, and asks the court to Preserve the Evidence, another words DO NOT KILL, Adopt or NUETER Moses, Michael Allmain's Personal Property. Then Prosecuting Attorney Julian Elizabeth St. Marie Says Moses has No Evidentiary Value and is NOT Evidence, yet this alleged 3rd party (NOT) as she calls it, CVAR still has Moses, So Why? On what legal grounds?

Julian Elizabeth St. Marie, Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney, (License# 27268)

#JusticeForMoses

Exploring More of the Topic of Was Michael Allmains Dog Moses Evidence in a City of Port Townsend Criminal Case or NOT? If so when did Moses become Evidence, why don't the Prosecuting Attorneys seem to know?

Was Moses Evidence in the Michael Allmain Case or NOT, you will see that the Prosecutors HAVE NO CLUE, and we will explore later why it is an important distinction. As they held Moses at CVAR indefinitely for Skin Condition and Ear Infection. Your Next.

Center Valley Animal Rescue, I Allege is Guilty of Bait and Switch. They act like they are helping someone and they Care, they publicly state they will provide on going care..

Then Center Valley Animal Rescue, have Fundraisers and there doting public gives them things and money, and really they did not provide ANY FREE Care, they got a 28k Judgment it seems, and still have Moses, someone Else's Personal Property they Stole with pre-meditated intent to do so, as the record of evidence I post sure looks like to me.

Bait and Switch is Not Legal as far as I interpret the laws, plus they sued a man for something they publicly proclaimed as a 501(c)3 non-profit that they themselves would pay for.

Center Valley Animal Rescue WILLING to Provide Ongoing Care. Bait and Switch Video Commentary and Evidence

Click Below for video commentary

Center Valley Animal Rescue WILLING
to Provide Ongoing Care. Bait and Switch

https://rumble.com/vnenw9-39315321.html

#JusticeForMoses

1) Directly or indirectly employ any scheme, device, or artifice to defraud or mislead any person, including but not limited to engaging in bait and switch.

RCW 19.230.340
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=19.230.340

CVAR Bait and Switch

RCW 19.230.340

Prohibited Practices

It is a violation of this chapter for any licensee, executive officer, responsible individual, or other person subject to this chapter in connection with the provision of money services to:

(1) Directly or indirectly employ any scheme, device, or artifice to defraud or mislead any person, including but not limited to engaging in bait and switch advertising or sales practices;

(2) Directly or indirectly engage in any unfair or deceptive act or practice toward any person, including but not limited to any false or deceptive statement about fees or other terms of a money transmission or currency exchange;

(3) Directly or indirectly obtain property by fraud or misrepresentation;

(4) Knowingly make, publish, or disseminate any false, deceptive, or misleading information in the provision of money services;

(5) Knowingly receive or take possession for personal use of any property of any money services business, other than in payment for services rendered, and with intent to defraud, omit to make, or cause or direct to omit to make, a full and true entry thereof in the books and accounts of the business;

(6) Make or concur in making any false entry, or omit or concur in omitting any material entry, in the books or accounts of the business;

(7) Knowingly make or publish to the director or director's designee, or concur in making or publishing to the director or director's designee any written report, exhibit, or statement of its affairs or pecuniary condition containing any material statement which is false, or omit or concur in omitting any statement required by law to be contained therein; or

(8) Fail to make any report or statement lawfully required by the director or other public official.

Consumer Protection

"The division enforces the Consumer Protection Act (RCW 19.86) and other statutes to help keep the Washington marketplace free of unfair and deceptive practices. The division investigates and files legal actions to stop unfair and deceptive practices, recovers refunds for consumers, seeks penalties against offending entities, and recovers costs and fees to ensure that wrongdoers pay for their actions. Division staff participate in the many legislative initiatives that affect consumer protection each year."

Chapter 19.86 RCW

UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES—CONSUMER PROTECTION

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=19.86

Non-Profits Misleading DONORS

"AG Ferguson cracks down on two veterans' charities for misleading Washington donors. "

https://www.atg.wa.gov/news/news-releases/ag-ferguson-cracks-down-two-veterans-charities-misleading-washington-donors

Yes the Above is not about animals however it is Case Law in Washington State on Non-Profits Misleading DONORS.

Lot's More Case Law to Come, Stay Tuned

#JusticeForMoses

Adam P. Karp Alleged Fraud on the Courts, Abuse of Process. Michael Allmain Case Port Townsend. May 13th, 2019 Center Valley Animal Rescue FB Thread, 56 Comments Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary.

I allege that Adam P. Karp, Center Valley Animal Rescue, Officer Wendy Davis and other Conspired to steal a homeless man's dog, with pre-meditated intent to place a lien for future services on this dog that they would later place a lien on to STEAL this man's property, cause him massive mental anguish, and punish him for life in their own special form of Vigilante Justice, I call Fraud on the Courts, Abuse of Process, Theft, Selective Prosecution, Painting in False Light, Criminal Defamation with intent to incite harm, loss of commercial value in breeding rights, loss of Emotional Support Warmth and Safety, and more Laws I intend to provide evidence on and file criminal complaints at some point.

For now the story and evidence will roll out via Blogs, Video Commentary, Trial Transcripts via Video, a Deeper Look Article Series, then onto a Master Chronology List, a Living Book online with links to all Evidence I allege, and a regular book at some point. As this Case alone shows how the entire process works when hundreds tell a STORY, Paint a Man in False Light, vilify him in the court of public opinion and they decide who gets to have their property, their pet and they decide the punishment and use your courts and your tax dollars to do it.

May 13th, 2019 CVAR, Center Valley Animal Rescue Facebook Thread Proving Intent and More Evidence of Crimes, I Allege.

Part ONE 56 Comments, May 13th, 2019 CVAR Facebook Thread, Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary.

https://rumble.com/vnepra-adam-p.-karp-alleged-fraud-on-the-courts-abuse-of-process.-michael-allmain-.html

Part Two, 56 Comments, May 13th, 2019 CVAR Facebook Thread, Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary.

https://rumble.com/vnccn1-adam-p.-karp-alleged-fraud-on-the-courts-abuse-of-process.-michael-allmain-.html

#JusticeForMoses

(hashtag Created by Michael's Daughter)

Michael and Moses Facebook Group

https://www.facebook.com/groups/michaelallmaincase

Officer Wendy Davis Blog Expose

https://OfficerWendyDavis.blogspot.com/

Jefferson County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Melissa Pleimann

https://JCprosecutingattorneyMelissaPleimann.blogspot.com/

Posted here by Reverend Crystal Cox

Universal Church of Light Port Townsend ReverendCrystalCox@gMail.com

Monday, October 4, 2021

Working on Legal Options, I call intent to steal a man's dog and cause deliberate malicious mental anguish. More insights into the Vigilante Mob that Destroyed a Man's Life with Vicious Intent.

May 13th 2019 CVAR Facebook Post, Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary. Let’s take a look at what the gang is saying on this post. Michael Allmain Case Jefferson County Port Townsend

Click Below to Watch Video

PART ONE

https://photos.app.goo.gl/2beTgT7812Y4obtc9

PART TWO

https://photos.app.goo.gl/NT6LgJAJYenmrsSR9

Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary on CVAR Facebook Page, Comments in Reaction to July 10th, 2019 Port Townsend Leader Article.

JULY 10th 2019, Port Townsend Lead Article about the FIRST Incident with CVAR, Moses and Michael. Titled "DID THE COUNTY POLICY FAIL THIS DOG?" Below is Reverend Crystal Cox's Commentary on this Article

July 10th 2019. CVAR FB THREAD, PORT TOWNSEND LEADER ARTICLE called "Did County Policy Fail this Dog?

Here is the July 10th, 2019 Port Townsend Leader Article

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16iYmJQaSEo2D5Wrl9zIDmW1--FBgNQS1/view?usp=sharing

CVAR Facebook thread May 12th 2019. Michael Allmain Case. Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary on Intent and other Evidence. Moses Healed Faster With his Human, Moses did NOT need sedated when with Michael, only when alone with CVAR or JCHS

Moses healed faster with his human and Moses did not need to be sedated when with his human.

Moses Healed Faster With his Human, Moses did NOT need sedated when with Michael, only when alone with CVAR or JCHS

Direct Link to Video Above https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipcK5mv-pXM

Posted here by Reverend Crystal Cox, Universal Church of Light Port Townsend.

CVAR Facebook thread May 12th 2019. Michael Allmain Case Port Townsend Washington. Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary on Intent and other Evidence

Direct Link to Video Above

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYR5sVzLbhg

Saturday, October 2, 2021

November 24th 2020 MOSES Released to CVAR Authorized by Officer Wendy Davis, a Deeper Look. How, When and Why Did Michael's Dog Go to CVAR? Were all the Laws, Statutes and Codes Followed? Was Moses Evidence when it went to CVAR or was that Made up later?

November 24th 2020 MOSES Released to CVAR

Humane Society for Jefferson County Releases Moses to CVAR. Let's Take a Look.

Keep in mind I plan to do a Deeper Look article on each player, aspect and laws I feel apply over time, this is all for your research and to help me organize all I intend to file later with various agencies and authorities and a Living Book online with all videos, document and transcripts and FOI emails, and a regular book on this story also.

The Link below is the Documents that Transferred Michael Allmain's PROPERTY, his Emotional Support Dog, his family to CVAR, Center Valley Animal Rescue.

Was the Animal At Large Laws / Codes Followed?

Were they required to Keep Moses longer at the Human Society as a Matter of Law?

Can they claim you or your dog have a "history" because of a past accident and use that to transfer your animal at large (your private property) to another town in the same county? to a non-profit ? AS A MATTER OF LAW?

And can they by law keep your PROPERTY, 4 months and counting now and place a lien on the property they took for services they forced on you by taking your private property, with proven prior malicious intent, by placing a premeditated lien.

As shown at this CVAR Facebook Thread Below. Of which I call proof of premeditated, malicious intent to harass this man, steal his property, lie to him, break the law to take his dog, kill Michael, drag him behind a care and other vicious vigilante mob violent rhetoric that led to real world harm. Enabled by the statutes on that same post provided by animal attorney Adam P. Karp. Adam Karp gave the statute, they all discussed it and set out to execute, 2 years later they accomplished it, I allege with a whole lot of proven co-conspirators.

An out of Control Mob Mentality Assumption Relentless after this guy. Stalking Him, threatening him, letting his dog lose out of his truck, following him and more.

And this Facebook thread is what incited that violence. Victim (Defendant) Michael Allmain answered every allegation on the CVAR Facebook Page to try and calm the violent hate and rage and death threats and CVAR deleted his side of the story, as did the Port Townsend Community Page.

a Few Screen Shots of the Premeditated Plan to place a future lien to STEAL private property, I Allege.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/fX4TReJinMzcucPd6

Full CVAR Facebook Thread, MINUS the side of the victim, the side of the guy they are maliciously discriminating against, violent threats, breaking law threats, lying that dog is dead threats and painting a false "history" of Michael Allmain and his dog Moses.

CVAR seems to have deleted Michael Allmain (the property owner) side of the story, as did the Port Townsend Community Facebook page so here is the side of the Lynch mob and a few compassionate critical thinkers.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TIwVMqLaqb6yOhYsyaGfI7GPGN2Syg6a/view

Center Valley Animal Rescue Lynch Mob Thread, CVAR I allege premeditating to STEAL a homeless man's dog.  YOU Decide for yourself. 

Below is my, Reverend Crystal Cox, Commentary on the CVAR Facebook Thread. A 6 part video series I recorded March 13th, 2021.

Part ONE

https://odysee.com/@ReverendCrystalCox:2/center-valley-animal-rescue-thread-may:a?r=5RdydwaQUaCC43vYWvSy2ibt8djDQi9W 

Part TWO

https://odysee.com/@ReverendCrystalCox:2/part-two-center-valley-animal-rescue:9 

Part Three

https://odysee.com/@ReverendCrystalCox:2/part-three-center-valley-animal-rescue:4 

Part Four

https://odysee.com/@ReverendCrystalCox:2/part-four-center-valley-animal-rescue:6 

Part Five

https://odysee.com/@ReverendCrystalCox:2/part-five-center-valley-animal-rescue:b 

Part Six

https://odysee.com/@ReverendCrystalCox:2/part-six-center-valley-animal-rescue:2

Was it Lawful to NOT tell the Owner of the dog, the property was located? A homeless man they all knew, as admitted by saying history, as well as lot's of other evidence proving the City of Port Townsend and the County knew exactly how to contact, find this man.

Was it Lawful to Deny the Owner ANY information on where his property was, where his family, his Emotional support dog was?

Was it lawful for the Humane Society for Jefferson County to give out information on Moses's location and treatment to other members of the community? or anyone?

Was it lawful to use a "history" against this man, and take his personal property and to a location of which he is given no information on where his property is? NO VISITATIONS?

The "history" the Human Society refers to in the Letter does not exist as a matter of law, in my opinion, it only exists in hearsay.

Yes Mike Allmain's dog had an accident, that was 2 years ago. That SHOULD not be used in a case of animal at large, and called "history" and if it can, as a matter of law then any of you that have a dog that has ever had an accident of any kind then that is "HISTORY", unadjudicated history and can and will be used against you to 'steal" (I allege) your property, keep your emotional support dog and with NO information to you regarding where your family member your private personal property is.

AND with NO Legal REMEDY TO GET YOUR PROPERTY BACK. Moses was transferred from the City of Port Townsend to a Non-Profit in Quilcene, WA (same county) within 24 hours, was this lawful? There was NO REMEDY Given for the Property Owner to retrieve his property, his Emotional Support Dog, until 3 months later, as of which so much time passed that Center Valley Animal Rescue racked up over $11,000 in bills, of which at that point they could place a lien and keep the property forever, and with prior intent proven to do this exact thing to steal, take this property, this particular homeless man's dog.

Officer Wendy Davis Legal Remedy Notice 3 MONTHS into IT.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15FlGjpyTNuTrtixHpAOAMD2Z9F1xJzSZ/view

Video of Reverend Crystal Cox Discussing

the City of Port Townsend Officer Wendy Davis Letter Officer Wendy Davis City of Port Townsend FINALLY 3 months in Notifies Michael they have his dog.

https://odysee.com/@ReverendCrystalCox:2/officer-wendy-davis-city-of-port:3

Was it Lawful to provide a REMEDY to retrieve the property, the emotional support dog 3 months later? The law, as stated in the Remedy Letter above that the REMEDY has to be provided within a "feasible" amount of time, is Feasible a legal term? Does 3 months, and after a $11k Vet Bill (at that time was 11k ended up at 28k) racks up, seem FEASIBLE as a matter of Law?

Is it Lawful to then finally give this Remedy, state the EXACT Total Amount to be paid to redeem your PRIVATE PROPERTY, YOUR Emotional Support Dog, and then when you meet their REMEDY Demands, they change the TOTAL and add more to the REMEDY? Was this lawful? IF SO YOU ARE NEXT.

Unadjudicated means it was not found to be true in a court of law, yet they are using the prior accident as history as if a court found it true, and that is not what happened. The History allegation is painting Michael Allmain in false light (another allegation I will point out in a criminal complaint), this false light defamation, affected Michael in his animal at large case. Was all this by the book folks? Was it lawful? If you feel it was, then it had better apply to everyone, past and future, any dog for any reason in Jefferson County.

ONLY a Lynch Mob, I call them, a group of local individuals, government agencies, non-profits and attorneys saying there is a history of neglect, NOT TRUE as a matter of law, right? (NOT Adjudicated Fact, Simply Vigilante Justice now being rewarded by Jefferson County.

So if your dog has an accident, and years later they find your dog at large, got off the leash somehow fro ANY reason then they can transfer it from the Humane Society for Jefferson County to a non-profit, give you no information and keep your dog for 4 months (now nearly a year) and charge you huge fees to get your dog, your property, your life back. All because of "history" that was "hearsay"?

IF YOU FIND ALL THIS LAWFUL. OK FINE. THEN IT NOW APPLIES TO EVERY PERSON IN JEFFERSON COUNTY. Every Dog at large, of which I see weekly. Every Household, Every camper, tourist, homeless person, and well it SHOULD and WILL apply Equally to ALL. Unless of course this is simply a matter of Discrimination against this ONE Port Townsend Homeless Man.

Click Below to Read the Communications that Released MOSES, Michael Allmain's Private Property and Support dog from the City of Port Townsend, from the County Humane Society and to a local private non-profit called Center Valley Animal Rescue.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GbEJb8iBKml_02oqzqSEXQR4ydJpuxzl/view?usp=sharing

Posted here by
Reverend Crystal Cox
of Universal Church of Light

ReverendCrystalCox@gMail.com

Video Transcript and Commentary on Hearing for Petition and Motion for Return of Animal. February 26th 2021. Michael Allmain Criminal Case Jefferson County WA

Reverend Crystal Cox, Universal Church of Light, 3 Part Commentary on Hearing, with link to full hearing on bottom of post.

February 26th 2021

1. Part One Reverend Crystal Cox Video Commentary on Hearing for Petition and Motion of Return of Animal.

https://rumble.com/vn8htw-1-hearing-on-petition-and-motion-for-return-of-animal.-2-26-2021-michael-al.html

2. Part TWO Reverend Crystal Cox Video Commentary on Hearing for Petition and Motion of Return of Animal.

https://rumble.com/vn8hug-2.-hearing-on-petition-to-return-animal-2-26-2021-michael-allmain-case-jeff.html

3. Part Three. Reverend Crystal Cox Video Commentary on Hearing for Petition and Motion of Return of Animal.

https://rumble.com/vn8gxo-3.-commentary-on-petition-and-motion-for-return-of-animal-hearing-michael-a.html

Link to Hearing in Full Below, Hearing Starts at 42 minutes in

https://photos.app.goo.gl/TMYLbgUck1uKHj439

A Deeper Look at Moses, Michael's Dog being Evidence or NOT in this Jefferson County Washington Criminal Case. Michael Allmain Case Port Townsend.

My, Reverend Crystal Cox Commentary Below is regarding 3-26-2021 Hearing, Nat Jacobs is Michael's attorney and we see Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Julian Elizabeth St. Marie and Jefferson County Melissa Pleimann - Deputy Prosecuting Attorney. Judge Mindy Walker Presiding.

THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND TOOK A HOMELESS MAN'S DOG IN WINTER RIGHT BEFORE THANKSGIVING AND NEVER RETURNED HIM. Michael Allmain Criminal Case a Deeper Look Series of Articles, Videos, Commentary, Blog Posts and more.

City of Port Townsend / Jefferson County vs Michael Allmain

Criminal Evidence: Michael Allmains Dog who was taken to CVAR, Center Valley Animal Rescue and never returned to this day of Oct. 1 where they are now auctioning Moses off, Monsters Among Us Port Townsend, Jefferson County.

3-26-2021 Jefferson County Washington Hearing, City of Port Townsend, Jefferson County vs. Michael Allmain Criminal Case. commentary by Reverend Crystal Cox of Universal Church of Light exploring Michael's dog Moses as Evidence, Vet Car, CVAR says they don't expect to get paid, and more.

RCC Commentary on Hearing from 39 minute mark.

https://rumble.com/vn8lys-melissa-pleimann-elizabeth-st.-marie-prosecuting-attorney..html

This video transcript, in full, is linked below, the commentary above is from 39 minutes https://photos.app.goo.gl/1AfbTNWoc8snXHtR7

City of Port Townsend / Jefferson County vs Michael Allmain

3-26-2021 Jefferson County Washington Hearing, City of Port Townsend, Jefferson County vs. Michael Allmain Criminal Case. commentary by Reverend Crystal Cox of Universal Church of Light exploring Michael's dog Moses as Evidence, Vet Car, CVAR says they don't expect to get paid, and more.

RCC Commentary on part of 3-26-21 Hearing 55-58 minutes into the video transcript.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSFNdwvgd3o

This video transcript in full, is linked below, the commentary above is from 55-58 minutes

https://photos.app.goo.gl/1AfbTNWoc8snXHtR7

Posted here by Reverend Crystal Cox, Universal Church of Light

a Deeper Look, was Michael Allmain's Dog Moses Evidence, a bit on the Lien and a bit more exploration. Moses as Evidence, a Deeper Look. 1

I will post all these regarding Moses as Evidence on one post soon, for now they will have their own post. At what point did the Prosecuting office consider Moses Evidence?

oh and Does the City of Port Townsend have a Contract with CVAR?

Full Video of this Hearing Linked Below,

My commentary above is from 55-58 minutes in

https://photos.app.goo.gl/1AfbTNWoc8snXHtR7

Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney Julian Elizabeth St. Marie

Jefferson County Melissa Pleimann - Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

Adam P. Karp Animal Attorney

Moses as Evidence, a Deeper Look

Wednesday, October 6, 2021

RCW 19.230.340https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=19.230.340

Monday, October 4, 2021

Saturday, October 2, 2021

RCW 19.230.340
https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=19.230.340